2002 VESTRY INDEX | PUBLICATIONS & DOCUMENTS
The next meeting of the Vestry
Thursday, April 18, Parish Library
6:00 p.m. - Supper
6:30 p.m. - Focus Session: Pre-school
7:00 p.m. - Business Session
The March meeting of the Vestry of the Chapel of the Cross was held at St. Matthew's, Hillsborough, on Tuesday, March 19, 2002. Vestry members present were Sidna Rizzo (Sr. Warden), Terry Eason (Jr. Warden), Andy Dobelstein, Joe Ferrell, John Nelson, Barbara Schütz, Stacey Tompkins, Suzanne Sauter, Ted Vaden, and Robert Wright. Also present were Stephen Elkins-Williams (Rector), Tammy Lee (Associate for Parish Ministry), Barbara Hastings (Parish Administrator), Ed Holland (Treasurer), and Nancy Kelly (Clerk).The Rector presided and opened the meeting at 6:35 p.m..
Devotions
The devotions were led by Mr. Eason, who chose the Service for the Early Evening from the Book of Common Prayer. He included prayers for mission and for St. Joseph.Timekeeper
Mrs. Schütz agreed to serve as timekeeper.
There were no parish concerns expressed.Top
There were no corrections to the minutes of the focus session of February 21.The following corrections were made to the minutes of the Vestry meeting of February 21:
p. 5, delete last two paragraphs under New Congregation Proposal, directly above Treasurer
p. 6, second line under Personnel, change "Barbara Schütz" to "Barbara Hastings"
p. 7, first line, change "The Personnel Committee has begun the search" to "The Personnel Committee discussed arrangements for beginning the search"
It was moved by Mr. Nelson, seconded by Mrs. Rizzo, and passed unanimously, that the Vestry approve the minutes of the focus session of February 21 and the minutes of the Vestry meeting of February 21.
The task of Mr. Holland is to remain on the list, pending completion. Mr. Holland stated that the surplus each year is rolled over into the General Fund, and he asked if these funds should be earmarked in a special fund. Mr. Elkins-Williams said that it should be left to the Treasurer and the Finance Committee as to how to report these surplus funds.Top
The following items were placed on the Consent Agenda: -- the nominations of Robert Millikan, Jeffrey Cline, Dania Ermentrout, and Carolyn Rugen to the Social Minstry Committee -- the nomination of Sandra McClaskey to chair the Social Ministry Committee.TopIt was moved by Mr. Vaden, seconded by Mr. Eason, and passed unanimously, that the Vestry approve the Consent Agenda.
Referring to item 4 of his report, Mr. Elkins-Williams said that he is not interpreting this no as a final no, but rather as no for this year. He plans to write out and communicate his concerns about the process with Bishop Curry.
Mr. Dobelstein, referring to item 5 of the report, asked about the decision not to have a priest in charge during the Rector's sabbatical. Mr. Elkins-Williams replied that he doesn't feel the need to bring in someone from outside. Our other parish priests have specific areas of expertise, and the priest on call would respond to emergencies.
Junior Warden
Mr. Eason had already reported on the Space Use Study Committee
Parish Administrator
The Parish Administrator's report is attached. Also attached is a note from Mary Lycan, on behalf of the women who participated in the first North Carolina Women's Choral Festival on February 9, thanking the Chapel of the Cross for use of the buildings.
Treasurer
Attached is the Treasurer's Report for February 2002.
Mr. Holland said that February was a better month than January, but there is still a deficit. He explained that the property and liability insurance payment in February was for additional coverage. He noted that pledge income is behind previous years.
Mr. Vaden asked if the budget is in trouble. Mr. Holland replied that January and February are traditionally tight months for the budget.
Mr. Ferrell asked if ACS has the capacity to accrue pledges. Mrs. Hastings replied that she believes that it does not. Mr. Holland added that this would be an accounting nightmare. Mrs. Schütz said that it might be interesting for the Vestry to know how much of the pledge total is quarterly or yearly. Mrs. Hastings said that all pledges are reported on a yearly basis and that parishioners don't commit to a particular payment schedule. The request for weekly or monthly envelopes is the only indication of how parishioners might be expected to pay their pledges.
Mr. Wright said that the committee is in the process of drafting a job description for the Facilities Manager position.
Mr. Ferrell asked if there has yet been any discussion of the search for a vicar for the new mission. Mr. Wright replied that the Personnel Committee does not plan to write the job description for this position.
Mr. Eason said that in addition to making some upgrades to existing space, there needs to be some rearrangement of space.
The committee agreed on two significant assumptions: parking should not be reduced to create additional space for building additions, and, with the exception of programs with a residential component (such as the Johnson Intern Program), facilities should not be located off-site.
Mr. Eason then asked the Vestry for feedback, and asked if there should perhaps be an additional charge to the committee.
Mr. Eason was asked if the space needs of the parish will change if we start a mission, to which he replied that we need to be open to growth.
Mrs. Schütz asked about the possibility of renting space at the Morehead or elsewhere for occasional large fellowship events. Mr. Eason said that this could be done perhaps one or two times per year. Ms Lee said that large funeral receptions and the Shrove Tuesday dinner, among other events, are problematic. Mr. Ferrell agreed that more fellowship space seems to be a major need, saying that we are the "prisoner of incremental program needs."
Mr. Eason said that there's a sense of the buildings that the Chapel of the Cross should have and that we shouldn't take intermediate steps that would interfere with long-range building plans. In order to avoid this pitfall, we need to engage in strategic planning.
Mr. Ferrell said that when the Child Care Center was begun, the buildings were under-utilized, and he asked to what extent we are committed to the Child Care Center at the expense of the space needs of the parish. Mr. Elkins-Williams stated that the playground does not exist just because of the Child Care Center; it is used by the church school classes and Junior Choir as well.
Mrs. Rizzo asked what should be the next step. Mr. Eason replied that there's more that the committee can do without hiring outside professional help. We need to be looking at space needs for the next fifteen years or so. He suggested that the charge to the committee needs to be clarified. Mrs. Schütz asked Mr. Eason to bring a recommendation to the Vestry.
Mr. Dobelstein observed that the work of the committee seems to be more focused on long-range planning than in the initial report. Mr. Eason said that he tried to keep a low profile on the committee. The committee began its work by considering more immediate issues rather than long-range needs. Ms Lee added that much of the focus on long-range needs was a result of experiences with the limitations of the dining room.
Mr. Dobelstein asked about the economics of doing what needs to be done to increase fellowship space. Do we do a major improvement, or do we make do with minor changes? Mr. Wright expressed the opinion that we should look at the bigger picture. Mr. Elkins-Williams said that we need to have a long-range plan for the ministry of the parish, to which Ms Lee added that long-range planning should relate to buildings and program. Mr. Vaden suggested that this would be a good topic of discussion for the May retreat.
Ms Sauter said that we need another set of data: Given X amount of space, what is the optimum use of this space?
Mr. Elkins-Williams expressed interest in the big picture and suggested that the parish not hire a professional until we have a better idea of the long-range plan.
The Vestry agreed to schedule more discussion of space use issues at the April meeting and again at the Vestry retreat in May.
Request for Second Canvass Asking
Paul Carew, chair of the recent Every Member Canvass, has proposed that the Vestry consider a second canvass asking. Many parishioners have expressed concern about the lack of a Christian Education Director. It would be advantageous to have this position in place in the 2002 budget when the time comes to fund it fully in the 2003 budget. There had been fourteen applications for the position, and if a second asking is approved, Mr. Nelson would reconstitute the search committee.
Mr. Dobelstein expressed the opinion that an additional asking shouldn't be tied to a particular need, but rather to the fact that the budget didn't meet the needs of the parish. He feels that this would set a bad precedent and would undermine the budget process. He expressed concern that it would be divisive, because there were other budgetary request not met.
Ms Sauter disagreed with Mr. Dobelstein, stating that this year we don't have a Christian Education Director as the direct result of lack of pledges. Mr. Eason added that the 2002 budget was balanced because the position of Christian Education Director was, by happenstance, vacant. Mrs. Rizzo added that the parish recognizes the importance of Christian Education. Mr. Holland noted that the budget was balanced by cuts in all areas, although the Christian Education position was a major item. Ms Lee added that Christian Education has already been stated to the parish, at the Annual Meeting, as a priority.
Mr. Wright observed that if we have a successful second asking, we are expecting parishioners to keep pledges at this level next year.
Mr. Ferrell moved to request a second asking, but it was not seconded at this time.
Mrs. Schütz expressed concern about what message the failure of a second asking would communicate. She asked for a sense of the Vestry as to whether the needed funds can be raised.
Mr. Vaden asked if a second asking would be undertaken by the past canvass chairs. Mr. Elkins-Williams replied that Mr. Carew is willing to undertake an additional asking. He said that a letter would be sent to all of those who have pledged in the past but did not pledge this year. A different letter would be sent to parishioners who have already made a pledge, asking them to consider increasing their pledge. Announcements would also be made from the pulpit and in Cross Roads. The second asking is not looking for one-time gifts, but rather additional or increased pledges.
Ms Tompkins asked that the Vestry keep in mind that those who have pledged this year have already increased their pledges over last year.
Mr. Elkins-Williams suggested that if the goal is not reached, perhaps a 30 hr. per week position could be funded, beginning September 1.
Mrs. Schütz suggested a quiet campaign to test the waters before launching a second asking. Mr. Elkins-Williams said that a little of this has already been done, with favorable response.
It was moved by Mr. Ferrell, seconded by Mr. Wright, and passed wth nine (9) in favor and one (1) opposed, that the Vestry authorize the Rector and the wardens and the chairs of the Every Member Canvass to launch a supplementary canvass to support the reinstatement of the position of Christian Education Director.
Mr. Eason asked if the committee could go ahead and determine which of the original candidates for the position are still available. Mr. Nelson said that this will be done.
Mr. Wright suggested that a draft of the letters to parishioners be reviewed by some Vestry members before mailing.
Orange County Mission
Attached are a memo from Mr. Ferrell, a draft budget for the proposed Orange County Mission, and an enabling resolution for Orange County Missioner.
Mr. Ferrell led the discussion of the draft budget. He stated that revenues show only what has already been committed to the project. An additional $5000 from St. Stephens and $13,500 from the Diocese should be added to the revenues shown in year 1. He said that year 3 of the proposal should be funded in part by pledges and contributions, as independent worship services would begin at that time.
Mr. Ferrell also commented on the enabling proposal, which covers the areas of the motion, budget, and oversight.
Mr. Dobelstein asked if the Chapel of the Cross personnel procedures and policies would apply to the position of Orange County Missioner. Mr. Ferrell said that they would apply, unless there is something contradictory in the policy, in which case the policy would need to be amended. The Chapel of the Cross, as the legal employer, would be legally responsible.
Mrs. Schütz said that she recalled that the Chapel of the Cross had committed to a contribution to the mission of $33,000 for three years. Mr. Ferrell confirmed this and said that the total is the same and that the funds are already available.
Mr. Elkins-Williams reported on concerns at the recent meeting of rectors and wardens. The Church of the Holy Family felt that there wasn't enough sense of mission and suggested that 1/4 of the Orange County Missioner's time be spent in each parish and 1/4 in the community among the unchurched.
Mr. Dobelstein asked how it will be decided what kind of parish is established and where it will be located. Mr. Elkins-Williams said that decisions will be made by committee at first, and then, as the mission develops, there will be more input from parishioners.
Meeting of the Combined Vestries of Chapel of the Cross, Church of the Holy Family, and St. Matthew's
Chapel of the Cross Vestry members present were Sidna Rizzo (Sr. Warden), Terry Eason (Jr. Warden), Andy Dobelstein, Joe Ferrell, John Nelson, Barbara Schütz, Stacey Tompkins, Suzanne Sauter, Ted Vaden, and Robert Wright. Also present were Stephen Elkins-Williams (Rector), Barbara Hastings (Parish Administrator), Ed Holland (Treasurer), and Nancy Kelly (Clerk).
Church of the Holy Family Vestry members present were Char Sullivan (Sr. Warden), Deedee Nachman (Jr. Warden), Carol Uphoff, Jane Humm, Rollie Tillman, Barbara Teagarden, Ruth Baldwin, Raymond Westan, Tim Brown, and Debbie McCarthy, and newly-elected (non-voting) Vestry members Mary Sugioka, Barry Gobble, and John Viccellio. Also present were Timothy Kimbrough (Rector), Lisa Fishbeck (Assistant to the Rector), and Bobbie Armstrong (Deacon).
St. Matthew's Vestry members present were Kenneth Garrison (Sr. Warden), Robert Quackenbush (Jr. Warden), Cathy Bennington, L. T. Matthews, Charles Murphy, Suzanne Maupin (Treasurer), Victoria Smith (Clerk), Jack Troxell, Rick Brewer, Jeff Hopper, and Ludie White. Also present were Brooks Graebner (Rector), Jean Parker Vail (Associate to the Rector), and Katherine Johnson (Deacon).
Previously attached were a memo from Mr. Ferrell, a draft budget for the proposed Orange County Mission, and an enabling resolution for Orange County Missioner.
The meeting of the combined vestries convened at 8:40 p.m.. Brooks Graebner, Rector of St. Matthew's, welcomed everyone to the meeting. He then outlined the agenda. The proposal itself will need to be moved and seconded by each parish. Mr. Elkins-Williams will speak about the proposal itself, Mr. Ferrell will speak about the draft budget, and Timothy Kimbrough, Rector of Church of the Holy Family, will speak about the search for Orange County Missioner. He asked that individuals identify themselves by name and parish when speaking.
The proposed enabling resolution is as follows:
Resolved: That the vestries of the Chapel of the Cross, Chapel Hill, the Church of the Holy Family, Chapel Hill, and St. Matthew's, Hillsborough, enter with good faith into a partnership to implement the proposal for calling an Orange County Missioner. And be it further resolved: that the three participating vestries endorse the projected budget for that position as set forth in the attachments and pledge their continuing support for this ministry during the three-year period covered by the proposal. Adjustments to the budget in light of changing needs and circumstances will be adopted by the Vestry of the Chapel of the Cross in consultation with the vestries of the Church of the Holy Family and St. Matthew's. And be it further resolved: that the three participating vestries authorize the rectors of their parishes and a lay representative of each of the three vestries to form an executive committee to oversee the implementation of the proposal and to serve as a call committee for the position of Orange County Missioner. The person who receives the executive committee's recommendation will then be issued a call from the Rector of the Chapel of the Cross to serve as an Assistant to the Rector of the Chapel of the Cross with the explicit and customary consent of the Vestry of the Chapel of the Cross and the Bishop of North Carolina.
Mr. Elkins-Williams suggested that each Sr. Warden move that the resolution be accepted and that each Jr. Warden second the motion.
It was moved by Kenneth Garrison, Sr. Warden of St. Matthew's, and seconded by Robert Quackenbush, Jr. Warden of St. Matthew's, that the enabling proposal for Orange County Missioner be accepted.
It was moved by Char Sullivan, Sr. Warden of the Church of the Holy Family, and seconded by Deedee Nachman, Jr. Warden of the Church of the Holy Family, that the enabling proposal for Orange County Missioner be accepted.
It was moved by Mrs. Rizzo, Sr. Warden of the Chapel of the Cross, and seconded by Mr. Eason, Jr. Warden of the Chapel of the Cross, that the enabling proposal for Orange County Missioner be accepted.
Mr. Elkins-Williams began the discussion by stating that this is a very exciting proposal in that it is forging a new identity as the church in Orange County. He spoke a little of the overlapping histories of the three parishes. St. Matthew's and the Chapel of the Cross have a common bond in William Mercer Green. The Church of the Holy Family was a mission parish of the Chapel of the Cross.
Ms Sauter asked why it will take two years of groundwork to get a congregation going. Mr. Elkins-Williams replied that this is a new approach for establishing a mission, much different from the diocesan model. The timeline proposed eases the impact on the three sponsoring parishes, but, in fact, the timetable may move along faster than anticipated.
Mr. Dobelstein asked if calling a vicar would imply that he/she would automatically become the rector of the parish, or would there be a review. Mr. Elkins-Williams replied that there would be a review.
Mr. Ferrell stated that the experiences with new church plants in Raleigh and Charlotte have provided lessons for this proposal. This will be a parochial mission rather than a diocesan mission. The mission will be independent when it is ready.
Ms Uphoff of the Church of the Holy Family asked if there will be any formal way to keep collegiality going after the initial years. Mr. Elkins-Williams replied that the Orange County Missioner would create a transitionary committee during year 2.
Ms Nachman of the Church of the Holy Family asked what support is being provided by the Diocese of North Carolina. Mr. Elkins-Williams said that the three rectors have met with Bishop Curry and that his few suggestions have been incorporated in the proposal. Mr. Wright has been looking for diocesan funding. Lisa Fishbeck, Assistant to the Rector at the Church of the Holy Family and Dean of the Durham Convocation, said that this is seen as a positive model. Mr. Elkins-Williams added that this is a good-faith effort to work together.
Mr. Ferrell led the discussion of the budget and began by stating that the groundwork for the budget was done by Mrs. Fishbeck several years ago.
The proposed salary for the position of Orange County Missioner increases by 4% annually. Health insurance is incremented by 10% annually. Furnishings and equipment include such items as a portable laptop and a cell phone, both of which will be necessary because the missioner will be working with all three parishes.
In addition to the revenue sources shown in year 1 of the draft budget, St. Matthew's will contribute $6282, the Treasurer of the Diocese has set aside $13,500, and St. Stephen's Durham has contributed $5000. Revenues in year 3 should include pledges and contributions from the new congregation.
Ms Nachman asked if priests are not subject to FICA. Mr. Ferrell replied that they are not, as they are considered to be self-employed.
Mr. Kimbrough led the discussion of the call process. Each of the three parishes will have equal input in the process. The official call will be issued by the Rector of the Chapel of the Cross. There had been discussion of whether or not the final candidate should be brought before all three vestries, but a more representative model was decided upon.
Mr. Vaden asked about the timetable for the call. Mr. Kimbrough said that the goal is to have someone in place no later than fall 2002. Mr. Elkins-Williams interjected that there is a meeting scheduled for tomorrow to begin the process. Mr. Kimbrough added that the timetable will in great measure be determined by whether or not there is local interest.
Mr. Viccellio of the Church of the Holy Family asked if the search committee will consider this year's seminary graduates. Mr. Elkins-Williams replied that the committee will be looking for someone who has been ordained for at least five years and has had some parish experience.
Mr. Graebner asked if there were any further questions, comments, or discussion.
Mrs. Schütz asked what will happen if a call is not issued by the time Mr. Elkins-Williams goes on sabbatical. Mr. Elkins-Williams replied that he will be available if the committee is close to making a recommendation, and, in any case, there is no deadline for issuing a call.
Mr. Tillman of the Church of the Holy Family called the question, and at 9:20 p.m., the enabling proposal for Orange County Missioner was passed unanimously by the Church of the Holy Family, St. Matthew's, and the Chapel of the Cross.
It had been moved by the sr. wardens of the three parishes, seconded by the jr. wardens, and it passed unanimously, that the vestries of the Church of the Holy Family, St. Matthew's, and the Chapel of the Cross accept the enabling proposal for Orange County Missioner.
Mr. Kimbrough suggested that 18 months after the call is made, all three vestries should meet again to discuss how the joint venture is going.
Mr. Elkins-Williams expressed appreciation for the hospitality of St. Matthew's in hosting this historic meeting.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:25 p.m., and photos of the clergy and vestries were taken for a historical record.
At 9:30 p.m. the group moved to the church for a brief service of Compline.
Respectfully submitted,
Nancy F. Kelly, Clerk of the Vestry
-- Consent Agenda
-- Treasurer's Report
-- Rector's Report
-- Parish Administrator's Report
-- Thank-You Note from Mary Lycan on Behalf of North Carolina Women's Choral Festival Participants
-- Memo RE: New Parochial Mission
-- Draft Four-Year Budget for Orange County Mission
-- Enabling Resolution for Orange County Missioner
Mr. Holland - Determine amount of reserves.
TOP | 2002 VESTRY INDEX | PUBLICATIONS & DOCUMENTS
© 2002: Chapel of the Cross.