Social
Ministry Committee
The report of the Social Ministry Committee is attached.
Mr. Lackey asked that the spelling of the names of Joanna Hiller
and Sara Donahue be corrected.
Hospitality
Guild
Attached is a memo from Mrs. Schoenfeld on plans for a Hospitality
Guild. She said that Barbara Day has agreed to co-chair the Hospitality
Guild with her.
Mrs. Schoenfeld passed around a sign-up sheet for Vestry members
to volunteer to be available at the coffee hour to greet parishioners.
Parlor
Renovations
Mrs. Hastings reported that the parlor floor is to be refinished
during the week of September 27. The fabric for furniture to be
reupholstered has been ordered. The new furniture has been ordered,
and delivery is expected in about twelve weeks. The goal is that
the project be completed by Advent.
Chapel Organ Committee
Clare Baum, Chair of the Chapel Organ Committee, and committee
member Terry Eason arrived to discuss with the Vestry concerns
that had been raised about the organ at the August Vestry meeting.
Ms Baum said that she has learned that if the Vestry delays the
decision to approve the footprint of the organ, the delivery date
would be moved back to late 2007 or early 2008, and the contract
and the pricing could also be affected. A final decision on the
ornamentation of the organ case can be delayed for a few months
without penalty, but the decision on the footprint needs to be
made immediately.
Mr. Evans said that it seems to be the general consensus that
it would be very expensive to make changes in the wall between
the organ and the sacristy. Mr. Elkins-Williams added that there
was also consensus that the (former) exterior walls of the chapel
should not be altered in any way. Mr. Evans said that the pews
can be moved without problem.
Mr. Taylor summarized the three issues that had been discussed
at the August meeting of the Vestry: the possibility of a delay
in approving the footprint for the organ, establishing communication
with the parish about the chapel organ, and the possibility of
making changes in the wall to minimize the impact of the footprint
on the chapel. There is concern about the size of the organ, but
there seems to be agreement that the option of altering the wall
is not a good idea.
Mr. Evans reported that the Buildings and Grounds Committee met
this week. The membership of this committee has some overlap with
the Chapel Committee and the Chapel Organ Committee. The committee,
although concerned about the bulk of the organ in the chapel space,
does not want to see the chapel structure altered to accommodate
the organ. It was suggested that the organ be moved as much to
the left as possible. An additional suggestion was to create a
pass-through window between the sacristy and the altar. Additionally,
the sacristy should be remodeled at the same time. There does
need to be an access passageway to the left of the organ for the
purpose of tuning the instrument.
Mr. Evans said that the Buildings and Grounds Committee discussed
the possibility of lowering the floor level of the organ and concluded
that this should not be done, although the Chapel Committee says
that the floor beams date only from the 1950’s.
Options that should be pursued with Dobson Pipe Organ Builders,
Ltd. are the possibility of lowering the swell box or raising
the access panels so that it would be possible to lower the organ
later.
As both the Buildings and Grounds Committee and the Chapel Committee
are concerned about the bulk of the organ, it would be helpful
to have a three-dimensional model. Dr. Khoury said that there
seems to be some misunderstanding about the size of the organ,
and that its size is not directly related to the number of stops.
Mr. Eason added that all stops are voiced to the space once the
organ is installed.
Mr. Taylor said that he senses that it’s time to move forward
on this project. Mr. Trapani agreed, adding that it’s time
to focus more on fundraising for the remainder of the project.
Mrs. DeSaix asked if it would be possible to revise the space
needed for tuning the organ. Mr. Taylor replied that reducing
the footprint would take away some of the functionality of the
instrument.
Mr. Elkins-Williams asked Mrs. Baum and Mr. Eason what action
the Vestry needs to take this evening. Mr. Eason replied that
in order for Dobson to go ahead and order materials, the Vestry
needs to reaffirm the contract and specifications for the organ.
Mr. Eason stated that the Chapel Committee is leaning towards
a simpler outer case design, with shorter pipes.
It
was moved by Mr. Trapani, seconded by Mr. Taylor, and passed unanimously,
that the Vestry affirm the specifications and timetable for the
chapel organ according to the contract already signed with Dobson
Pipe Organ Builders, Ltd. and that it request information to address
questions and concerns raised by the Buildings and Grounds Committee
and the Chapel Committee, to the extent that it doesn’t
jeopardize the project specifications or timetable.
Johnson Intern Program
Mary Agnes Rawlings arrived at the meeting to update the Vestry
on the Johnson Intern Program.
Attached are the proposed budget for the Johnson Intern Program
for the period August 1, 2004 to July 31, 2005, and a memo outlining
the work to be done on the program during this year.
Mr. Elkins-Williams reminded the Vestry that a small group of
the Johnson Intern Board is acting as an exploratory committee
to determine the future of the program. The program is at a point
of major transition, in that it is engaged in exploring non-profit
status, a community-wide board is being proposed, and it is working
to find ways to make the program more attractive to funding organizations.
Ms Rawlings reported that the furniture from the JIP house has
been stored for 2004-05.
Mr. Elkins-Williams observed that the proposed budget does not
include the $10,000 Strowd Rose gift, which depends both on achieving
non-profit status and on a definite intention to recruit interns
for next year. Mr. Taylor asked if the donors have any plans to
continue their support of the project, to which Mr. Elkins-Williams
replied that there is positive encouragement that this will be
the case. Mr. Taylor then asked if the donors agree with the plan
for this year. Mr. Elkins-Williams replied that all donors have
been contacted and have approved the plan.
Ms Rawlings suggested that there is the possibility of more income
from the partner agencies.
Mr. Trapani said that it is important to note that support in
the amount of $60,000 has been raised in a year in which there
are no interns in place.
It was moved by Mr. Lackey, seconded by Mr. Taylor, and passed
unanimously, that the Vestry approve the Johnson Intern Program
budget for 2004-05 as proposed.
Election of Delegates to Annual Convention
Each parish sends its clergy and a determined proportional number
of delegates to the Annual Convention. The Chapel of the Cross
has the maximum number of six delegates, of which two are elected
each year for three-year terms. Six alternates are also elected
each year. Responsibilities of the delegates include attendance
at two convocational meetings before the convention and then at
the convention itself in January.
Vivian Varner and Robert Wright have completed their terms as
delegates, Kim Sullivan and Laurie Gosnell have one year remaining,
and Terry Eason and Joe Ferrell have two years remaining of their
term.
The names of Syd Alexander, Paul Carew, Bob Chase, Emilie DeLuca,
Peter DeSaix, Larry Logan, Vivian Varner, and Robert Wright were
submitted for nomination as delegates. By secret ballot and with
Mrs. Hart and Mrs. Hastings acting as tellers, Mr. Wright and
Mr. Alexander were elected to three-year terms.
The names of Paul Carew, Bunnie Collura, Bob Chase, Emilie DeLuca,
Peter DeSaix, Larry Logan, and Vivian Varner were submitted for
nomination as alternates. By concensus, the vestry designated
Mrs. Varner as first alternate, Mrs. Collura as second alternate,
and Mr. Carew as third alternate. The remaining names were drawn
by lot: Mr. DeSaix as fourth alternate, Ms DeLuca as fifth alternate,
and Mr. Chase as sixth alternate.
Mr. Taylor will notify Mr. Wright and Mr. Alexander of their election
as delegates, and the parish office will notify the alternates.
Charge to the Long-Range Plan Implementation Committee
Attached is a memo outlining the proposed charge for the Long-Range
Plan Implementation Committee.
The following changes were made to the charge:
-change the name of the committee to Long-Range Plan Next Step
Committee
-change “hire and direct the work of consultants”
to “facilitate the hiring and direct the work of consultants”
-correct the typo “will made periodic status reports”
to “will make periodic status reports”
-to the list of ex-officio members, add “Treasurer”
after “Hospitality Committee Chair”
There was further discussion about the name of the committee,
and it was decided that the rector and wardens be given the option
of changing the committee name.
It was moved by Mr. Taylor, seconded by Mr. Trapani, and passed
unanimously, that the Vestry approve the charge for the Long-Range
Plan Next Step Committee, with the understanding that the rector
and the wardens be given the option of changing the name of the
committee.
|