Following a bag supper, the Vestry met in focus session in the parish library for a preliminary overview of what will take place at the parish gatherings in the feasibility phase of the capital campaign. Vestry members present were Jim Crow (Sr. Warden), Steve Lackey (Jr. Warden), Chris Bowes, Mary Schoenfeld, Terry Eason, Ann Henley, Melody Savage, Clare Baum, Gail Cloud, Larry Logan, and Sandra McClaskey. Also present were Bill Joyner (Deacon), Barbara Hastings (Parish Administrator), and Nancy Kelly (Clerk).
In the absence of the Rector, Mr. Crow welcomed to the meeting those present who have been involved in one of several phases of the project. Present were consultants Whitney Jones and Lisa Luzwick, Master Plan Committee members Martha Dill, Bruce Heflin, Jefferson Parker, Martha Schütz-Lo, Rob Sullivan, Dick Taylor, and Ramsey Terhune, and members of the Parish Dialogue Committee David Ross and Stephanie Perun. He then turned the meeting over to Mr. Ross.
Mr. Ross explained to the Vestry that the committee has completed about 35 interviews to date, with a goal of completing 50 by January, at which time the parish gatherings will begin. The purpose of this evening’s meeting with the Vestry is to present a trial run of what will take place at these parish gatherings and seek Vestry reaction to and suggestions for how to modify the plans.
The parish gatherings (agenda attached) will take place mainly in the homes of parishioners, although some may take place in retirement communities. Invitations to these gatherings will be sent to parishioners. Once the gatherings have taken place and the information from them has been studied, the committee will report to the Vestry in February or March.
Ms Perun then presented the trial run presentation. She began by stating that the gatherings will last about 90 minutes, beginning with a 20 minute Power Point presentation. The information in the Power Point includes the history of the Master Plan, including a Master Plan timeline; the vision for the parish; a description of the space history of the parish house, its growth, and the perceived needs for the future; the proposal for new construction; elevation views; an implementation timeline; and recognition of parishioners who have been involved in the project to date.
Mrs. Dill made several suggestions about the design of the slides in the Power Point. She suggested that there be minimal text on each slide and that each slide be focused on a single issue. It was also suggested that more color be used to heighten interest. The goal is to attract the attention of the viewer without causing distraction from too much information at once.
Mr. Taylor suggested that parishioners don’t fully understand the nature of the space inadequacies of the parish hall. He suggested that there needs to be more emphasis on why we need more space. Mr. Sullivan commented that in an effort to create needed space, we have in the past had to convert classrooms into office space. He noted that the existing parish hall is coming up on 100 years old, and we need to provide a vision for the future just as those in previous generations did in their day. He added that the church and chapel worship spaces do meet our program needs, and the committee found no need to alter those spaces.
Mr. Eason asked if this would make the presentation longer. Mr. Sullivan suggested that rather than making the presentation longer, the presentation be distilled to allow time for making a case for the need for the additional space. Mr. Logan added that parishioners need to be given reasons for the need for this space in terms of fulfilling the vision and mission of this church. He added that we need to focus more on concept than on specifics.
Mr. Crow suggested that it is a good idea to begin the presentation with the positive news that the worship space is adequate to our needs and follow that with the suggestion that we need to build comparable space to support the programs of the church.
Mr. Ross said that the committee will be doing several more trial runs of the presentation, and Mr. Logan said that the Vestry would probably like to see it again.
Mr. Taylor added that the cost of the project should not be mentioned until the end of the presentation.
Mrs. McClaskey asked if there will be a hand-out, and Ms Perun replied that parishioners will be given something in print to take home with them but that it will be handed out at the end so as not to serve as a distraction during the presentation.
Mr. Ross thanked the Vestry for allowing the committee to gather input in this way.
The focus session concluded at 7:00 p.m., and the Vestry moved to the more formal part of the agenda.
|