Finance
Committee
The report of the Finance Committee is attached. Also attached is the 2008 Budget Worksheet.
Mr. Varner stated that in the areas of Work Outside the Parish, Parish Program, and Program Support nearly all items were held at 2007 levels. In the area of Staff, salary increases were lowered from 3% to 2.5%.
Many lines decreased in the area of Physical Plant. Ms Baum explained that the significant decrease in the Property and Liability Insurance line item is the result of moving coverage to Church Insurance Corporation and raising the deductible to $10,000.
Mr. Hill reminded the Vestry that the pledged support for Episcopal Church of the Advocate is in its final year and that the sum committed to this support will come from the Program Fund and the Memorials Fund.
Mr. Elkins-Williams observed that the 2007 budget was a stretch, but the parish accomplished the funding goals. He re-emphasized that parish expenses are sound but that revenue is the problem, even if the budget is frozen at 2007 levels. He expressed the hope that the creation of the position of Director of Stewardship and Development and the ongoing Annual Giving Committee work will result in an improved pledge base.
Mr. Hill expressed concern that the general economy is a big issue that will continue to challenge the parish finances.
Ms Savage reviewed the motion from the executive session, that as a result of the budget shortfall, salaries for clergy and staff be frozen at 2007 levels, with the exception of the requirement to meet the clergy diocesan minimum, and the plan to convene in executive session again in April to review the pay plan. She expressed concern also about the increases recommended for nursery workers and about the requirement of enrollment of the Christian Formation Assistant in the pension plan due to additional hours during the sabbatical of the Christian Formation Director.
Mr. Elkins-Williams commented that there would be no requirement to keep the Christian Formation Assistant on the pension plan in 2009, because her hours would then fall again below the 1000 hours level, but he wondered if she would ever be able to collect on the pension contribution from 2008.
Mr. Hawkins suggested that, in order to avoid the pension enrollment requirement, the hours for the Christian Formation Assistant be limited and that she accomplish what she can within that limit. He suggested that perhaps she could be stipendiary, to which Ms Cloud replied that it would not be professionally acceptable to make her stipendiary. Mr. Elkins-Williams expressed concern that limiting the hours of the position would result in a decrease in program. Mr. Hawkins expressed concern that a precedent would be set by entering the position, even temporarily, in the pension category.
Mr. Elkins-Williams raised the issue of the proposal for the position of Assistant Organist-Choirmaster, which the Vestry last month approved in theory. Mr. Satterwhite asked about the possibility of a volunteer for this position, to which Mr. Elkins-Williams replied that Van Quinn doesn’t think this would be a likely solution. It was suggested that individual parishioners might be asked for special support for this position, to which Mr. Elkins-Williams suggested that it isn’t advisable to ask for special financial support for staff positions.
Ms Savage proposed that the salary for the music intern line item, the savings realized by reducing the supply organist line item to 2007 levels, limiting the salary for the position to $6000 (the lower end of the suggested range), and delaying hiring for the position until August 1 would make it possible to fund this position. Following discussion, it was decided to delay consideration of funding this position until the Vestry budget review in April.
Mr. Eason asked why some parishioners discontinued pledge support for 2008, to which Ms Henley said that there were a variety of reasons but no discernible trend.
Mr. Hawkins said that he would like more time to examine the budget proposal. Ms Savage said that the Finance Committee has already thoroughly examined the possibilities and has made its recommendations to the Vestry.
Ms Savage emphasized that the Vestry has already resolved to examine and reconsider this budget in April. She acknowledged that at that time the Vestry may need to make additional cuts or, more optimistically, may find a way to increase line items.
Mr. Dill suggested that the Finance Committee should set priorities for where cuts can or should be made, to which Mr. Hill replied that the Vestry should come up with suggestions for priorities to forward to the Finance Committee.
Mr. Elkins-Williams said that he would leave his housing allowance at the 2007 level, and he contacted Mrs. Jamieson-Drake, who said that she would reduce her housing allowance to $36,500.
Mr. Dill asked if anticipated income from endowments and investments has been adjusted for market conditions. Mr. Varner responded that adjustments have not been made, acknowledging that this could be an additional area of concern.
Mr. Hill said that all of the minor savings suggested don’t address the $90,000 shortfall. He then stated that an impact can only be made by going after the big-ticket items (ECOTA, JIP, and Diocesan Share) or by cutting program and staff.
Mr. Dill returned to the concept of having a strategy in mind. He suggested that such a strategy might include working for more revenue, making line item cuts, and tapping the Program Fund.
Mr. Hawkins asked about the possibility of charging a nominal fee to those community groups that are provided meeting space in the parish buildings. Mr. Elkins-Williams likened this to a decrease in outreach giving.
Mr. Eason asked why certain line items were kept at the 2007 level when, in fact, they did not spend the budgeted total in 2007. Mr. Elkins-Williams explained that it would be unwise to penalize those groups that were vigilant about their spending. Mr. Eason then suggested that the Vestry needs to thank those who underspent their 2007 budget, explain that they are being funded at the same level in 2008, and that the Vestry would appreciate continued vigilance over spending.
Mr. Elkins-Williams, returning to the proposal for a 0% salary increase, reminded the Vestry that the diocese has kept all line items at 2007 levels with the notable exception of salaries, which it has increased by 2.5%, and he cited for consideration as well the 2.3% increase in the cost-of-living.
Mr. Eason said that a 1-1.5% salary increase somewhat addresses the cost-of-living increase and, at the same time, would indicate an attempt to be fiscally responsible.
Ms Henley suggested that the Annual Meeting would be a good time to address the budget issues.
Mr. Hill asked about the possibility of a second asking, to which Mr. Elkins-Williams replied that the burden for covering the shortfall should be on those who haven’t yet pledged.
The motion from the executive session was presented for a vote.
It was moved by Ms Baum, seconded by Mrs. McClaskey, and passed with seven (7) in favor and four (4) opposed, that the Vestry reduce the cost-of-living raises from 2.5% to 0% for clergy and staff, with the exception of any increase necessitated by the requirements of the diocesan minimum for clergy and the exception of the nursery assistants, and that this Vestry meet again in executive session in April to review the status of the budget.
It was moved by Mr. Hill, seconded by Ms Savage, and passed unanimously, that the Vestry pass the proposed budget, with pledge revenue adjusted and the pay plan as modified by Vestry motion.
The Sr. Warden and the Chair of the Finance Committee will determine how to notify employees about the 0% salary increases. The Vestry will also share with the parish that it hopes to be able to reinstate the recommended salary increases after its April review of the budget and will thank those who carefully monitored line item expenses in 2007.
Buildings
and Grounds Committee
The report of the Buildings and Grounds Committee is attached.
Personnel Committee
The report of the Personnel Committee is attached.
|